| 141 | 0 | 145 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
【目的】开展气候变化背景下高寒水源区径流模拟与归因分析,可为高寒流域水文响应研究和水资源适应性管理提供理论依据。【方法】比选CMIP6方案并进行降尺度和Delta偏差矫正,选取CanESM5模式,采用四种SSP情景数据驱动VIC模型,模拟2021—2100年径流过程,并利用LSTM对长序列径流残差进行修正。采用Mann-Kendall检验、R/S分析、径流质心、不均匀系数、变化幅度、弹性系数和多元线性回归方法,评估径流年际、年内变化及气象因子敏感度和贡献度。【结果】未来流域气温和降水均增加,不同排放模式下气温增长率为0.05~0.37℃·(10a)-1,降水增长率为1.70~3.60mm·(10a)-1;LSTM残差修正后径流模拟精度较单一VIC模型高,桐子林站NSE由0.81提高至0.87,KGE由0.76提高至0.82;径流总体呈可持续上升趋势,且随排放强度增强由局部显著转为全流域显著。年内径流仍为单峰型,但来水重心前移,不同情景下Ct下降0.13~0.37,Cn和Cp分别下降0.17~0.68和0.90~5.85,丰枯差异缩小。径流对降水表现为全流域正敏感,对气温则呈现“上游正敏感、中游零敏感或弱负敏感、下游负敏感”的空间异质性。降水对未来径流变化的贡献率高达0.77以上。【结论】基于LSTM残差修正的VIC模型能有效克服高寒复杂流域径流模拟的局限性,提高径流预测精度。未来流域整体呈“暖湿化”发展,降水是驱动全流域径流增加的主导因子,气温起到调节作用。这种气候共同作用不仅增加了径流总量,更深刻改变了径流的年内分配节律。研究结果可为高寒水源区水安全管理与适应性调控提供理论支撑。
Abstract:[Objective] Runoff simulation and attribution analysis in alpine water source areas under climate change scenarios are conducted, providing a theoretical basis for hydrological response studies and adaptive water resource management in alpine basins. [Methods] The CMIP6 schemes were compared and selected, followed by downscaling and Delta bias correction. The CanESM5 model was selected, and four shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) scenario datasets were used to drive the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) model for simulating runoff processes from 2021 to 2100. The long-term runoff residuals were corrected using a long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Interannual and intra-annual runoff variations, along with the sensitivity and contribution of meteorological factors, were subsequently evaluated using the Mann–Kendall test, rescaled-range (R/S) analysis, runoff centroid, nonuniformity coefficient, variation amplitude, elasticity coefficient, and multiple linear regression. [Results] Air temperature and precipitation across the river basin in the future were projected to increase, with air temperature and precipitation increasing at rates of 0.05–0.37 °C per decade and 1.70–3.60 mm per decade, respectively, under different emission scenarios. After LSTM residual correction, the accuracy of runoff simulation was higher than that of the standalone VIC model, with the NSE and KGE values at Tongzilin station increasing from 0.81 to 0.87 and from 0.76 to 0.82, respectively. Runoff exhibited an overall persistent increasing trend, and the trend changed from locally significant to significant across the river basin as emission intensity increased. The intra-annual runoff remained unimodal, but the runoff centroid shifted earlier. Under different scenarios, Ct decreased by 0.13–0.37, while Cn and Cp decreased by 0.17–0.68 and 0.90–5.85, respectively, indicating a smaller difference between wet and dry seasons. Runoff was found to be positively sensitive to precipitation across the entire river basin, whereas its sensitivity to air temperature exhibited marked spatial heterogeneity, characterized by positive sensitivity in the upper reaches, near-zero or weakly negative sensitivity in the middle reaches, and negative sensitivity in the lower reaches. The contribution of precipitation to future runoff changes was estimated to exceed 77%. [Conclusion] The LSTM residual-corrected VIC model can effectively overcome the limitations of runoff simulation in complex alpine basins, thereby improving runoff prediction accuracy. The river basin is projected to exhibit an overall warming and wetting trend in the future. Runoff increases are primarily driven by precipitation, whereas air temperature plays a regulating role. The combined climatic effect increases total runoff volume and, more importantly, reshapes the intra-annual runoff distribution pattern. These findings offer theoretical support for water security management and adaptive regulation in alpine water source areas.
[1] 宋晓猛, 张建云, 占车生, 等. 气候变化和人类活动对水文循环影响研究进展[J]. 水利学报, 2013, 44(7): 779-790.
[2] 单敬敬, 苏布达, 陈梓延, 等. 全球温升1.5~4.0℃水平下西江流域径流变化趋势[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2024(9): 165-172.
[3] 周天军, 邹立维, 陈晓龙. 第六次国际耦合模式比较计划(CMIP6)评述[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019, 15(5): 445-456.
[4] 王予, 李惠心, 王会军, 等. CMIP6全球气候模式对中国极端降水模拟能力的评估及其与CMIP5的比较[J]. 气象学报, 2021, 79(3): 369-386.
[5] 黄进, 邱波, 安慧, 等. 基于CMIP6气候模式的丹江流域未来径流变化[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2026, 43(4): 61-70.
[6] 柳宏才, 张会兰, 孙嘉宁, 等. 基于VIC模型的金沙江流域水文要素分析和径流预测研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(5): 272-284.
[7] 崔晨璐, 张轩, 吴永祥, 等. 基于LSTM的洪水预报残差修正方法研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2026(6): 47-53.
[8] 孙大雁, 梁志峰, 李春红, 等. 基于GCN-LSTM模型的日径流模拟预测及超参数组合研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2025(10): 166-171.
[9] SHI C, LIU Q, BAI Y G, et al. Improving runoff simulation in cold alpine regions based on VIC-glacier by combining LSTM error correction technology[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2025, 663: 134251.
[10] 唐志光, 邓刚, 胡国杰, 等. 亚洲高山区积雪物候时空动态及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 冰川冻土, 2021, 43(5): 1400-1411.
[11] 李红英, 张存桂, 汪生珍, 等. 近40年青藏高原植被动态变化对水热条件的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(12): 4770-4783.
[12] 谷黄河, 焦雅迪, 王晓燕, 等. 青藏高原拉萨河流域径流组成及驱动因素[J]. 水科学进展, 2026, 37(2): 235-246.
[13] 张金良, 景来红, 李福生, 等. 南水北调西线工程总体布局及一期工程方案研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2023, 45(5): 1-5.
[14] 龙晓君, 李小建. 基于多源数据的中国地形海拔分级指标调整研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(10): 1577-1584.
[15] 魏榕, 刘冀, 张特, 等. 雅砻江流域中上游径流变化归因分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(7): 1643-1652.
[16] 张岚婷, 王文圣, 刘浅奎, 等. 大渡河流域年径流变化特征及其归因分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2021(3):96-102.
[17] 黄艳艳, 赵红莉, 蒋云钟, 等. 雅砻江上游径流及影响因素关系研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2018, 41(1): 127-133.
[18] 张东亚, 张志明, 侯轶群, 等. 大渡河上游鱼类资源现状与保护建议[J]. 人民长江, 2025, 56(9): 158-165.
[19] 李铭, 施召云, 吴南, 等. 近60年来雅砻江中上游水文气象要素变化特征[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2026(3): 56-68.
[20] 黄琦, 覃光华, 向俊燕, 等. 基于再分析降水与融雪模块的雅砻江上游径流模拟研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2021(5): 125-132.
[21] 韩红霞, 李建兵. 大渡河毛头码水文站水文资料一致性分析[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(1): 51-54.
[22] 杜娟, 于晓晶, 黎小东, 等. 基于Delta分位数映射法的青藏高原中东部IMERG卫星降水误差订正[J]. 高原气象, 2024, 43(2): 366-380.
[23] 颜冰. 变化环境下水资源承载力研究: 以沂沐泗流域为例[D]. 南京: 南京水利科学研究院, 2022.
[24] LIANG X, LETTENMAIER D P, WOOD E F, et al. A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1994, 99(D7):14415-14428.
[25] 饶天兴, 周刚, 张世强. 青藏高原北部格尔木河流域水文过程的模拟与预估[J]. 冰川冻土, 2024, 46(4): 1113-1127.
[26] 王雪佳, 孙若辰, 段青云, 等. 深度学习与响应曲面替代在分布式模型率定的对比[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2025, 23(6): 1401-1412.
[27] 张驰, 郭媛, 黎明. 人工神经网络模型发展及应用综述[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57(11): 57-69.
[28] 熊怡, 周建中, 孙娜, 等. 基于自适应变分模态分解和长短期记忆网络的月径流预报[J]. 水利学报, 2023, 54(2): 172-183.
[29] 邹佳成, 黄监初, 杨丽琳, 等. 耦合新安江模型与LSTM模型的赣江流域径流模拟研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2024, 42(7): 12-15.
[30] 魏志明, 岳官印, 李家, 等. GPM与TRMM降水数据在海河流域的精度对比研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017, 37(2): 171-176.
[31] 赵沛, 程伍群, 庞立军, 等. 基于SWMM的透水铺装系统的水文效应研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2019, 37(1): 29-31.
[32] 冯平, 张立斌, 李建柱, 等. 目标函数对滦河流域SWAT模型径流模拟不确定性的影响[J]. 水资源保护, 2023, 39(2): 17-24.
[33] 董旭, 梅琨, 商栩, 等. 基于Mann-Kendall检验和重标极差分析的水质变化趋势[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(2): 277-282.
[34] 党素珍, 刘昌明, 王中根, 等. 黑河流域上游融雪径流时间变化特征及成因分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2012, 34(4): 920-926.
[35] 涂新军, 陈晓宏, 张丽娟, 等. 时段长取值变化下的径流年内分配特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(1): 119-123.
[36] 谢云东, 章四龙, 王红瑞, 等. 基于SOM神经网络的年径流划分: 以密云水库为例[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2022(2):104-109.
[37] SANKARASUBRAMANIAN A, VOGEL R M, LIMBRUNNER J F. Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States[J]. Water Resources Research, 2001, 37(6): 1771-1781.
[38] 钟巧, 焦黎, 李稚, 等. 博斯腾湖流域潜在蒸散发时空演变及归因分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2019, 42(1): 103-112.
[39] LU K D, CUI T T, WANG Y T, et al. Prediction of future runoff in the Lancang River Basin based on CMIP6 under climate change[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2025, 59: 102413.
[40] 由宇军, 白云岗, 卢震林, 等. 缺资料地区可解释性混合机器学习模型中长期径流预报[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(7): 52-59.
[41] 丁永建, 赵求东, 吴锦奎, 等. 中国冰冻圈水文未来变化及其对干旱区水安全的影响[J]. 冰川冻土, 2020, 42(1): 23-32.
基本信息:
中图分类号:P333.1
引用信息:
[1]杨雪楠,黄昌硕,颜冰,等.基于LSTM残差修正VIC模型的雅砻江—大渡河流域径流预测及归因分析[J].水利水电技术(中英文)().
基金信息:
国家重点研发计划资助项目(2022YFC3202401); 南京水利科学研究院研究生学位论文创新基金(Yy526020)
2026-08-31
2026-08-31
2026-08-31