| 1,026 | 38 | 132 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
突发水污染事故风险分析可以为事故的防治与救援提供科学依据,保障水资源调度和供水安全。以北疆供水工程为研究对象,采用德尔菲法对其突发水污染事故进行识别,基于专家权重系数和D-S证据理论,改进"五标度"层次分析法并构建事故风险分析模型,采取改进层次分析法和传统层次分析法对工程突发水污染事故风险进行分析。结果表明,人为投毒投药、翻车致污染物入渠、雨洪致污染物入渠和农药化肥渗透入渠四类突发水污染事故发生的相对可能性和后果的相对严重性,改进层次分析法分析为0.080 3、0.280 0、0.359 7、0.280 0和0.706 9、0.122 9、0.095 7、0.074 5,综合相对风险大小为0.056 7、0.034 4、0.034 4和0.020 9;传统层次分析法分析为0.387 3、0.143 4、0.094 0、0.035 3和0.162 3、0.047 7、0.110 1、0.019 9,综合相对风险大小为0.549 6、0.191 1、0.204 2和0.055 2。综合相对风险大小排序一致,但从事故发生可能性和后果严重性相对风险大小可表明,改进层次分析法相较于传统层次分析法得到的结果更具有合理性和说服力,对工程管理提供更有力的参考价值。
Abstract:The risk analysis of sudden water pollution accidents can provide scientific basis for accident prevention and rescue, and ensure water resources dispatching and water supply safety. Based on expert weight coefficient and d-s evidence theory, this paper improves the "five-scale" analytic hierarchy process(AHP) and constructs an accident risk analysis model, and adopts the improved AHP and traditional AHP to analyze the engineering sudden water pollution accident risk. The relative probability and consequence of four types of sudden water pollution accidents, namely, man-made poisoning, turning over, rain flood and pesticide and chemical fertilizer, were obtained. The AHP was improved to 0.080 3, 0.280 0, 0.359 7, 0.280 0 and 0.706 9, 0.122 9, 0.095 7, 0.074 5, the generou relative risk sizes are 0.056 7, 0.034 4, 0.034 4 and 0.020 9; and the traditional AHP was 0.387 3, 0.143 4, 0.094 0, 0.035 3 and 0.162 3, 0.047, 0.010 1, 0.019 9, the general relative risk sizes are 0.549 6, 0.191 1, 0.204 2 and 0.055 2; the overall relative risk order is basically consistent. However, the relative risk size from the probabil of accidemt and the severity of comsequem can show that the improved AHP is more reasonable and persuasive than the traditional AHP, and provides more powerful reference value for engineering management.
[1] 杨海东,肖宜,王卓民,等.突发性水污染事件溯源方法[J].水科学进展,2014,25(1):122- 129.
[2] 左其亭,罗增良,马军霞.水生态文明建设理论体系研究[J].人民长江,2015,46(8):1- 6.
[3] SHAW K.,SHANKAR R.,YADAV SS,et al.Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain.Expert Systems With Application,2012(39):8182- 8192.
[4] 李廷鹏,李岳,徐永成,等.基于改进PERT的装备使用保障过程建模分析[J].系统工程与电子技术,2015,37(7):1575- 1580.
[5] 薛利红,杨林章.采用不同红边位置提取技术估测蔬菜叶绿素含量的比较研究[J].农业工程学报,2008(9):165- 169.
[6] 罗启华,周研来,杨娜,等.基于SAR模型和蒙特卡罗法的防洪调度风险分析[J].人民长江,2011,42(1):4- 8.
[7] GRIENSVEN A V,MEIXNER T,GRUNWALD S,et al.A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models[J].Journal of Hydrology,2006,324(1- 4):1- 23.
[8] 顾晓昀,徐宗学,刘麟菲,等.北京北运河河流生态系统健康评价[J].环境科学,2018,39(6):2576- 2587.
[9] 林少华,刘嘉宁,陈东等.基于故障树理论的电网调度操作实时风险评估[J].电力自动化设备,2014,34(5):121- 125.
[10] SHI S G,CAO J C,FENG L,et al.Construction of a technique plan repository and evaluation system based on AHP group decision-making for emergency treatment and disposal in chemical pollution accidents.Journal of Hazardous Materials,2014(276):200-206.
[11] 程远,刘志彬,刘松玉,等.基于层次分析法的大跨浅埋公路隧道施工风险识别[J].岩土工程学报,2011,33(S1):198- 202.
[12] 冯平,闫大鹏,耿六成,等.南水北调中线总干渠防洪风险评估方法的研究[J].水利学报,2003,24(4):40- 45.
[13] 练继建,孙萧仲,马超,等.水库突发水污染事件风险评价及应急调度方案研究[J].天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版),2017,50(10):1005- 1010.
[14] 林锦国,魏世孝.AHP中(0,2)EM法与(1/9,9)EM法的比较研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1994(5):64- 69.
[15] 王艳艳,韩松,喻朝庆,等.太湖流域未来洪水风险及土地风险管理减灾效益评估[J].水利学报,2013,44(3):327- 335.
[16] 顾冲时,苏怀智,刘何稚.大坝服役风险分析与管理研究述评[J].水利学报,2018,49(1):26- 35.
[17] 胡德秀.供水系统环境影响风险分析研究——以“引额济乌”工程供水系统为例[D].西安:西安理工大学,2001.
[18] 林锦国,魏世孝.AHP中(0,2)EM法与(1/9,9)EM法的比较研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1994(5):64- 69.
[19] 夏蓓鑫,陈鑫,李龙,等.采用模糊层次分析法的PFMEA方法改进及应用[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2017,38(6):868- 874.
[20] PAGER R R.Comparing approximate reasoning and probabilistic reasoning using the Dempster-Shafer framework[J].International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2009,50(5):812- 821.
[21] 陈广洲,汪家权,李如忠,等.基于D-S证据理论的水利工程招标评价[J].水力发电学报,2012,31(3):263- 266.
[22] EVES H.Elementrary Matrix Theory[M].New York:Dover Publications,1980.
[23] 何理.水环境突发性与非突发性风险分析的理论和方法初步研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2002.
[24] 陈志鼎,刘豪,肖芳.水电工程EPC项目采购风险评估[J].人民长江,2015,46(5):109- 112.
[25] Sexsmith R C,Reid S C.Safety factors for bridge falsework by risk management [J].Structural Safety,2003,25:227- 243.
[26] 韩晓刚,黄廷林.我国突发性水污染事件统计分析[J].水资源保护,2010,26(1):84- 86.
[27] 李玉峰,张静,青剑英,等.一起人为投毒引起的食物中毒调查[J].地方病通报,2007(3):76.
[28] 赵然杭,陈超,李莹芹,等.南水北调东线工程山东段突发事故风险评估[J].南水北调与水利科技,2017,15(4):180- 186.
[29] 杜兆林,张志浩,曹慧哲,等.基于响应时间效应的突发水污染应急决策分析[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2018,50(2):122- 130.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2020.10.019
中图分类号:X52
引用信息:
[1]徐丹,王双银,甘治国,等.基于改进层次分析法的突发水污染事故风险分析[J],2020,51(10):159-166.DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2020.10.019.
基金信息:
国家重点研发计划之高寒区供水渠道突发险情应急调度与抢险技术(2017YFC0405105);; 陕西省水利科技项目(2017slkj-1)