| 129 | 3 | 258 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
针对目前混凝土坝抗震安全评价缺乏统一标准,综合评价模型忽略了指标间评级分界不同导致分级程度不明确等问题,文章通过建立三维坝体-坝基塑性损伤有限元模型进行设计、校核工况下的响应计算;选取整体损伤指数、坝顶相对于坝踵的顺河向位移、坝基交界面屈服比作为指标,建立可拓物元模型,并应用信息论中的熵理论对指标赋权,确定大坝抗震性能评价等级。将基于熵权法的重力坝抗震性能可拓物元评价方法应用于西南某水电站工程。结果表明,重力坝地震破坏主要集中在坝踵、上下游折坡处,采用单一指标的评价结果出现指标间矛盾,而采用可拓评价能全面给出重力坝抗震性能评级,为准确评估重力坝抗震性能提供一种行之有效的方法。
Abstract:In view of the lack of a unified standard for the seismic safety evaluation of concrete dams at present, and the comprehensive evaluation model ignores the problems of unclear classification degree due to the different rating boundaries between indicators, this paper establishes a three-dimensional dam body-dam foundation plastic damage finite element model to simulate design conditions and MCE load. The overall damage index, the displacement of the dam crest relative to the dam heel along the river, and the yield ratio of the dam foundation interface are selected as indicators to establish an extension matter-element model, and the entropy theory in information theory is used to weight the indicators to determine the maximum dam seismic performance evaluation grade. The Extension Matter-element Evaluation Method for the seismic safety of gravity dam based on Entropy Weight Method is applied to a hydropower station project in southwest China. The results show that the earthquake damage of gravity dam is mainly concentrated in the dam heel and the upper and lower slopes. However, the use of extension evaluation can give a comprehensive rating of the seismic performance of gravity dams, which provides an effective method for accurately evaluating the seismic performance of gravity dams.
[1] 孔宪京,陈健云,邹德高.高坝抗震安全理论发展趋势研究[J].水力发电学报,2020,39(7):1-11.
[2] 章明旭,王进廷 .高混凝土坝抗震安全风险评估框架[J].水力发电学报,2020,39(11):13-20.
[3] 张丽芬,廖武林,曾夏生,等.水库诱发地震对混凝土坝的影响及抗震设防[J].长江科学院院报,2010,27(5):71-75.
[4] 张楚汉,金峰,王进廷,等 .高混凝土坝抗震安全评价的关键问题与研究进展[J].水利学报,2016,47(3):253-264.
[5] 钟红,李晓燕,林皋.基于破坏形态的重力坝地震易损性研究[J].大连理工大学学报,2012,52(1):60-65.
[6] 沈怀至,张楚汉,寇立夯.基于功能的混凝土重力坝地震破坏评价模型[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2007(12):2114-2118.
[7] 黎曼.基于性能的混凝土重力坝地震易损性分析及风险评估[D] .天津:天津大学,2013.
[8] 张社荣,王高辉,王超.混凝土重力坝极限抗震能力评价方法[J].水力发电学报,2013,32(3):168-175.
[9] 郭涛,张纹惠,武亮.考虑多指标因素的重力坝抗震安全评价方法研究[J].振动工程学报,2020,33(1)196-205.
[10] HARIRI-ARDEBILI,M A,SAOUMA V.Quantitative failure metric for gravity dams[J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,2015,44(3):461-480.
[11] 孔宪京,庞锐,邹德高,等.基于IDA的高面板堆石坝抗震性能评价[J].岩土工程学报,2018,40(6):978-984.
[12] WANG X,XUE B,XU B,et al.Role of strong motion duration on seismic responses of high concrete faced rockfill dams[J].Structures,2021,32:1092-1102.
[13] 刘肖军,陈文龙,宋文帅,等.基于改进IDA的混凝土坝地震易损性研究[J].中国科学技术科学,2018,48(10)1103-1112.
[14] 王晓玲,戴林瀚,吕鹏,等.基于DSR-可拓云的渗流安全综合评价研究[J].天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版),2019,52(1):52-61.
[15] 吕鹏,王晓玲,余红玲,等.基于FDA的大坝渗流安全动态可拓评价模型[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2020,48(5):433-439.
[16] 田芬芳,王雪蓉,黄耀兴.基于多因素可拓物元法的围岩稳定性评价[J].人民长江,2021,52(S1):277-280.
[17] 黄显峰,智冉,金国裕,等.基于可拓物元分析法的水安全保障可靠度评价研究[J].人民黄河,2021,43(5):91-95.
[18] LUBLINER J,OLIVER J,OLLER S,et al.A plastic-damage model for concrete[J].International Journal of Solids and Structures,1989,25(3):299-326.
[19] LEE J.A Plastic-Damage concrete Model for Earthquake Analysis of Dams[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,1998(9):937-956.
[20] 丁柱,张立翔.强地震作用下混凝土重力坝响应特性分析[J].水利水电技术,2016,47(10):1-5.
[21] 王超,张社荣,黎曼,等 .基于损伤指数模型的重力坝地震破坏等级划分[J].地震工程与工程振动,2014,34(6):218-226.
[22] 马智勇,张伟,周强,等.基于位移的重力坝地震易损性分析方法[J].振动与冲击,2017,36(22):51-58.
[23] 沈怀至,张楚汉,金峰.基于性能的重力坝坝基交界面地震抗滑稳定评价[J].水力发电学报,2009,28(1):137-142.
[24] 潘超,张瑞甫,王超,等.单自由度混联Ⅱ型惯容减震体系的随机地震响应与参数设计[J].工程力学,2019,36 (1):129-137.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2022.S2.036
中图分类号:TV642.3;TV312
引用信息:
[1]邓云瑞,祝日康,陈平,等.重力坝抗震性能熵权可拓物元评价研究[J].水利水电技术(中英文),2022,53(S2):165-172.DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2022.S2.036.
基金信息:
天津市自然科学基金(19JCYBJ22600)
2022-09-20
2022-09-20