| 164 | 9 | 126 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
以广西桂平航运枢纽扩建工程为研究对象,利用FLAC3D数值模拟软件,结合监测资料对两种支护方案下的深基坑边坡稳定性进行计算与分析。结果表明:基坑开挖后底部以卸荷回弹为主,两侧边坡以朝向基坑内侧变形为主,锚索锚杆支护方案整体位移大于桩锚结合支护方案;依据监测资料,基坑两侧边坡变形随开挖深度增大影响较大,但基坑左侧边坡相对基坑右侧边坡变形较小,基坑右侧边坡变形与河床水位相关性较大;数值模拟结果与监测资料结果在变形规律上较为吻合,桩锚结合支护方案在深基坑边坡支护效果上优于锚索锚杆支护方案,推荐采用桩锚结合支护方案对深基坑边坡进行支护。本文的研究对类似工程具有重要参考价值。
Abstract:In this paper, taking the expansion project of Guiping Shipping Hub in Guangxi as the research object, FLAC3 D numerical simulation software and monitoring data were used to calculate and analyze the stability of deep foundation pit slope under two supporting schemes. The results show that: after the excavation of the foundation pit, the bottom of the foundation pit is mainly unloaded and the slope on both sides is mainly deformed towards the inside of the foundation pit. The overall displacement of the anchor cable and bolt support scheme is greater than that of the pile-anchor combined support scheme. According to the monitoring data, the deformation of the slope on both sides of the foundation pit is affected by the excavation depth. However, the deformation of the slope on the left side of the foundation pit is smaller than that on the right side of the foundation pit. In addition, the deformation of the slope on the right side of the foundation pit has a great correlation with the river level. The results of numerical simulation are consistent with the results of monitoring data in terms of deformation law, and the pile-anchor combined support scheme is better than the anchor cable and bolt support scheme in the supporting effect of deep foundation pit slope, so it is recommended to adopt the pile-anchor combined support scheme to support the deep foundation pit slope.
[1] 陈祖煜,向远鸿.上海地区深基坑支挡结构稳定安全标准研究[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2018,16(2):81-89.
[2] 赵云,朱俊臣,李凡,等.浅海围堰与软土深基坑支护结构协同设计及应用研究[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报.2014,12(2):138-143.
[3] 秦景,赵云,路威,等.滨海软土区排水箱涵深基坑工程设计及施工技术分析[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2013,11(4):314-318.
[4] 秦景,路威,朱俊臣.三门核电循环水泵房超深基坑支护设计实例[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2013,11(2):157-160.
[5] 程家文,符平,王历,等.ABD 综合楼基坑工程设计及相关问题探讨[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2006,4(3):202-206.
[6] 陈林靖,孙永佳,王志刚.深基坑内撑式支护结构的有限差分算法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(S1):3315-3322.
[7] 周勇,朱乔红,朱彦鹏,等.“一桩两用” 新型支护结构在某深基坑支护中的应用分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(S1):3168-3177.
[8] 李波,王志鹏,龚壁卫,等.深大坑中坑基坑围护结构离心模型试验研究[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2017,15(4):303-307.
[9] 王超,朱勇,张强勇,等.深基坑桩锚支护体系的监测分析与稳定性评价[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(S1):2918-2923.
[10] 徐伟,夏乔网,徐鹏飞,等.软土地基临江特大型相邻深基坑同期施工监测分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(S1):2676-2683.
[11] ZHOU N,VERMEER P A,LOU R,et al.Numerical simulation of deep foundation pit dewatering and optimization of controlling land subsidence[J].Engineering Geology,2010,114(3-4):251-260.
[12] YONG T,WANG D.Characteristics of a Large-Scale Deep Foundation Pit Excavated by the Central-Island Technique in Shanghai Soft Clay.Ⅱ:Top-Down Construction of the Peripheral Rectangular Pit[J].Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering,2013,139(11):1894-1910.
[13] VIEIRA C S,LOPES M,CALDEIRA L M.Earth pressure coefficients for design of geosynthetic reinforced soil structures[J].Geotextiles & Geomembranes,2011,29(5):491-501.
[14] 王卫东,徐中华.预估深基坑开挖对周边建筑物影响的简化分析方法[J].岩土工程学报,2010(S1):32-38.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2022.S2.077
中图分类号:TV551.4;TV61;U64
引用信息:
[1]黄秘昌,黄祖芹,邓检强,等.含软弱夹层构造的临水深基坑变形规律与支护研究[J].水利水电技术(中英文),2022,53(S2):399-405.DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2022.S2.077.