| 485 | 7 | 143 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
土壤侵蚀是世界上最严重的环境问题之一,研究土壤侵蚀强度空间格局及其影响因子相互作用对于缓解土壤侵蚀具有重要意义。基于RUSLE模型对鲁中山区2005年、2015年土壤侵蚀进行评估,综合土地利用、降雨量、坡度、植被覆盖度、高程、土壤类型、流域等影响因子,应用地理探测器方法对不同地貌类型上的土壤侵蚀进行定量归因,并提出了相应的水土保持措施。结果表明:(1)2005年鲁中山区土壤侵蚀模数为1 273 t/(km2·a),年土壤流失量为1 561.36万t;2015年鲁中山区土壤侵蚀模数为1 039 t/(km2·a);年土壤流失量为1274.35万t。(2)鲁中山区土壤侵蚀强度以轻度、中度侵蚀为主,土壤侵蚀主要集中在北部和西北部的山地丘陵区。2005—2015年鲁中山区土壤侵蚀逐渐改善,土壤侵蚀强度主要由轻度侵蚀以上向微度侵蚀转化。(3)在各种影响因子中,坡度与植被覆盖度是决定土壤侵蚀空间异质的主导因子,其次是土地利用类型。但随着海拔升高,在低、中山区坡度的解释力降低,植被覆盖度的解释力明显增强。(4)双因子交互作用有助于增强土壤侵蚀的解释力。坡度与植被覆盖度的协同作用大大增加了单因子对土壤侵蚀的解释力。因此,禁止陡坡耕地及退耕还林对减缓鲁中山区土壤侵蚀具有重要作用。
Abstract:Soil erosion is one of the most serious environmental problems in the world. It is of great significance to study the spatial pattern of soil erosion intensity and the interaction of its influencing factors to alleviate soil erosion. Based on RUSLE model, soil erosions in 2005 and 2015 in the mountainous area of Mid-Shandong are evaluated, and then the quantitative attribution of the soil erosion is made on different geomorphological types with the geodetector method through integrating the influencing factors, i.e. land-use; rainfall, slope gradient, vegetation coverage, elevation, soil type, watershed, etc., while the corresponding soil and water conservation measures are put forward as well. The result shows that(1) in 2005, the soil erosion modulus in the mountainous area of Mid-Shandong is 1 273 t/(km2·a) with the annual soil loss of 15.613 6 milliont in 2005, while the soil erosion modulus is 1 039 t/(km2·a) with the annual soil loss of 12.743 5 milliont therein in 2015;(2) the intensities of the soil erosions in the mountainous area of Mid-Shandong are mainly mild and moderate erosions, while the soil erosions are mainly concentrated within the northern and northwestern mountain-hilly areas. The soil erosions therein are gradually improved along with the conversion of the soil erosion intensity from the erosion above the mild-level to the micro-level erosion from 2005 to 2015;(3) Among various influencing factors, the dominant factors for determining the spatial heterogeneity of soil erosion are the slope gradient and the vegetation coverage, while the next is the land-use type. However, the explanatory power of the slope gradient is decreased and the explanatory power of the vegetation coverage is obviously increased in the lower-mid mountainous areas along with the rise of the altitude;(4) dual-factor interaction is helpful to enhance the explanatory power of the soil erosion, while the synergistic effect between the slope gradient and the vegetation coverage largely increases the explanatory power from a single factor on the soil erosion. Therefore, prohibiting the cultivation on steep slope and returning farmland to forest are necessary for alleviating the soil erosion in the mountainous area of Mid-Shandong.
[1] 郑粉莉,王占礼,杨勤科.我国土壤侵蚀科学研究回顾和展望[J].自然杂志,2008,30(1):12- 16.
[2] WISCHMEIER W H,SMITH D.Prediction rainfall erosion losses:a guide to conservation planning science[M].Washington D C:USDA,1978.
[3] 周璟,张旭东,何丹,等.基于GIS与RUSLE的武陵山区小流域土壤侵蚀评价研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(4):468- 474.
[4] 李天宏,郑丽娜.基于RUSLE模型的延河流域2001—2010年土壤侵蚀动态变化[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(7):1164- 1175.
[5] 尹璐,闫庆武,卞正富.基于RUSLE模型的六盘水市土壤侵蚀评价[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(3):389- 396.
[6] 张宇婷,肖海兵,聂小东,等.基于文献计量分析的近30年国内外土壤侵蚀研究进展[J/OL].土壤学报,2019:1- 19 [2020- 03-05].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1119.P.20191029.1608.012.html.
[7] 马骞,于兴修,刘前进,等.沂蒙山区土壤侵蚀空间分布及其影响因素动态变化[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(22):4652- 4662.
[8] 钟莉娜,王军,赵文武.多流域降雨和土地利用格局对土壤侵蚀影响的比较分析:以陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区为例[J].地理学报,2017,72(3):432- 443.
[9] 邹雅婧,闫庆武,谭学玲,等.渭北矿区土壤侵蚀评估及驱动因素分析[J].干旱区地理,2019,42(6):1387- 1394.
[10] 曹巍,刘璐璐,吴丹.三江源区土壤侵蚀变化及驱动因素分析[J].草业学报,2018,27(6):10- 22.
[11] 郝姗姗,李梦华,马永强,等.黄土丘陵区土壤侵蚀因子敏感性分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(2):77- 86.
[12] 董元杰,付伟章,陈为峰,等.鲁中山区小流域坡面土壤侵蚀产流、产沙及侵蚀方式变化过程的研究[J].土壤通报,2010,41(1):185- 188.
[13] 王艳华,董元杰,张民,等.鲁中山区小流域坡面侵蚀土壤养分空间分异特征研究[J].土壤,2011,43(2):179- 183.
[14] 胡国庆,董元杰,邱现奎,等.鲁中山区小流域坡面土壤侵蚀的磁性示踪法研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(5):169- 173.
[15] 周来,张博,陈丽萍,等.基于GIS的福建省将乐县土壤侵蚀及保持定量分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(6):23- 30.
[16] 王涛.陕北洛河流域降水和植被变化对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(20):295- 300.
[17] WANG Huan,GAO Jiangbo,HOU Wenjuan.Quantitative attribution analysis of soil erosion in different geomorphological types in karst areas:Based on the geodetector method [J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2019,29(2):271- 286.
[18] 王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116- 134.
[19] 胡先培,曾成,钱庆欢,等.基于RUSLE模型的铜仁地区1987—2015年土壤侵蚀时空特征[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(2):158- 166.
[20] 徐萍,刘霞,张光灿,等.鲁中山区小流域不同土地利用类型的土壤分形及水分入渗特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(5):89- 95.
[21] 刘文超,刘纪远,匡文慧.陕北地区退耕还林还草工程土壤保护效应的时空特征[J].地理学报:2019,74(9):1- 18.
[22] 章文波,谢云,刘宝元.利用日雨量计算降雨侵蚀力的方法研究[J].地理科学,2002,22(6):705- 711.
[23] 李恒凯,吴立新,熊云飞,等.基于RUSLE模型的离子稀土矿区土壤侵蚀时空演变分析-以岭北矿区为例[J].稀土,2016,37(4):35- 44.
[24] WILLIAMS J R,RENARD K G,DYKE P T.EPIC,Method for assessing erosion′s effects on soil productivity[J].Soil Water Conservation,1983,38:381- 393.
[25] 王晓瑞,隋雪艳,林晨,等.长江中下游低山丘陵区土地整治对区域水土流失变化的影响机制研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(4):893- 902.
[26] BESKOW S,MELLO C R,NORTON L D,et al.Soil erosion prediction in the Grande River Basin,Brazil using distributed modeling[J].Catena,2009,79:49- 59.
[27] 蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):19- 24.
[28] 游松财,李文卿.GIS支持下的土壤侵蚀量估算:以江西省泰和县灌溪乡为例[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(1):62- 68.
[29] 许月卿,邵晓梅.基于GIS和RUSLE的土壤侵蚀量计算:以贵州省猫跳河流域为例[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(4):67- 71.
[30] 苟照君,李英年,刘峰贵,等.黄河上游高寒草地土壤全氮含量分布特征及其影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(9):2585- 2594.
[31] 王欢,高江波,侯文娟.基于地理探测器的喀斯特不同地貌形态类型区土壤侵蚀定量归因[J].地理学报,2018,73(9):1674- 1686.
[32] 肖继兵,孙占祥,刘志,等.降雨侵蚀因子和植被类型及覆盖度对坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(22):159- 166.
[33] 刘致远.基于遥感和GIS技术的滇中地区土壤侵蚀研究[D].昆明:云南师范大学,2019.
[34] 吴淑芳,吴普特.水土保持及土壤侵蚀动态机制研究现状及存在问题[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(2):37- 40.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2020.10.026
中图分类号:S157.1
引用信息:
[1]李翠艳,孙希华,刘曰庆.鲁中山区不同地貌类型土壤侵蚀定量归因[J],2020,51(10):209-219.DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2020.10.026.
基金信息:
山东水土保持学会重点领域创新资助项目(sdsbxh20181105);; 国家自然科学基金项目(41871121)