nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2020, 02, v.51;No.556 177-183
房渣土地基强夯加固三维数值模拟研究
基金项目(Foundation): 北京市南水北调配套工程河西支线工程项目(NSBD-PT-HXZX-KS);; 北京市水务五个一人才培养计划项目
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2020.02.021
摘要:

为反映强夯加固作用下房渣土地基应力应变变化特点,在北京永定河园博园湿地强夯现场试验和实测资料的基础上,结合工程及加固区域地层环境特点,对房渣土强夯动力响应进行数值模拟研究,探讨房渣土地基相关物理量的响应规律,并与实际测量结果进行对比验证。研究结果表明:相对横向应力,竖向应力的最大值更大,并且竖向应力的分布区域主要集中在夯锤下方的土体中,而横向应力则更接近土体表面。动力数值模拟中夯坑的沉降量随夯击次数变化的曲线大致呈现负幂函数形式,第七击的单击沉降量小于0.1 m,总夯沉量1.23 m,曲线末端趋于水平,估计极限夯沉量在1.2~1.4 m之间。强夯过程的数值模拟结果和实际监测结果比较接近。模拟分析得出的位移与应力变化规律对于强夯加固回填土地基工作具有重要的参考意义。

Abstract:

In order to reflect the characteristics of the changing characteristics of the stress-strain of the miscellaneous soil-filling foundation under the effect of dynamic compaction, a numerical simulation study is made on the basis of the experimental and measured data from the in situ experiment of the dynamic compaction of the wetland for Beijing Garden Expo in combination with the characteristics of the project and the stratigraphic environment within the reinforcing area, and then the response law of the physical quantities of the miscellaneous soil-filling foundation is discussed, while a comparative verification is made with the measured results as well. The study result shows that relative to lateral stress, the maximum value of vertical stress is larger, for which the distribution area of vertical stress is mainly concentrated in the soil mass below the rammer, while the lateral stress is closer to the surface of the soil mass. The curve of the ramming times-dependent settlement of the tamping pit in the numerical simulation of the dynamic response approximately exhibits a form of negative power function, of which the settlement from the seventh single ramming is less than 0.1 m, while the total ramming settlement is 1.23 m and the end of the curve tends to be horizontal, thus the ultimate ramming settlement is estimated to be between 1.2 m~1.4 m. The numerical simulation result is more close to that of the measured one during the dynamic compaction. The displacement and stress changing law obtained from the simulative analysis have important referential significances for the reinforcement of miscellaneous soil-filling foundation made by dynamic compaction.

参考文献

[1] 地基处理手册编写委员会.地基处理手册[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.

[2] 袁鸿鹄,刘爱友,姜晶,等.北京园博园回填土地基强夯振动效应测试研究[J].资源环境与工程,2013,27(4):541- 545.

[3] 文思强,李云鹏,马康.强夯能量利用率反演及加固影响范围研究[J].岩土力学,2015,36(S2):185- 192.

[4] 向泽华,胡焕校,吴高权.强夯作用下土体动力特性的数值模拟[J].水资源与水工程学报,2015,26(6):207- 211.

[5] 王卫强.强夯冲击响应数值模拟与设计参数研究[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版),2015,11(10):116- 118,132.

[6] 刘香,周鑫,许有俊.高炉渣粉煤灰地基回填料的强夯数值模拟[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版),2016,41(4):1116- 1122.

[7] 张雨,张延军,胡延玉.基于FLAC3D的机场软基处理方法模拟研究[J].路基工程,2017(3):60- 63,68.

[8] 闫吉成,余湘娟,陈永辉,等.粉土地基强夯加固效果影响因素数值模拟研究[J].能源与环保,2018,40(2):150- 155.

[9] GHASSEMI A,PAK A,SHAHIR H.Numerical study of the coupled hydro-mechanical effects in dynamic compaction of saturated granular soils[J].Computers and Geotechnics,2010,37(1/2):10- 24.

[10] 范文超,蔡新,徐宝明,等.强夯荷载作用下地基竖向位移数值分析[J].水利水电科技进展,2018,38(4):75- 80.

[11] 周亮.强夯法加固软粘土地基的离散元数值分析[J].湖南交通科技,2018,44(4):40- 42.

[12] 朱本明.基于FLAC软件模拟强夯加固吹填砂地基[J].水运工程,2018(3):161- 165.

[13] 周梦佳,宋二祥.高填方地基强夯处理的颗粒流模拟及其横观各向同性性质[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2016,56(12):1312- 1319.

[14] 北京市水利规划设计研究院.北京园博园湿地填土地基强夯加固试验实测分析研究[R].北京:北京市水利规划设计研究院,2013.

[15] 文思强.基于回填土地基强夯试验的动力效应分析研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2014.

[16] 钱家欢,帅方生.边界元法在地基强夯加固中的应用[J].中国科学(A辑),1987,3(3):329- 336.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2020.02.021

中图分类号:TU753.8

引用信息:

[1]宫晓明,袁鸿鹄,蒋少熠,等.房渣土地基强夯加固三维数值模拟研究[J],2020,51(02):177-183.DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2020.02.021.

基金信息:

北京市南水北调配套工程河西支线工程项目(NSBD-PT-HXZX-KS);; 北京市水务五个一人才培养计划项目

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索