| 158 | 0 | 3 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
【目的】大型水库作为区域水资源调控的重要基础设施,在抗旱减灾中发挥着日益凸显的战略作用。水库抗旱减灾综合效应的评价涉及多因素、多量纲,如何科学准确地量化水库的综合抗旱减灾效应已成为当前研究的难点。【方法】首先构建了“抗旱能力—抗旱效应—减灾效益”三维九指标的指标体系;然后采用熵权法耦合三维欧几里得模长(EWM-3D-ENM)的综合评价方法,将指标向量映射至三维效应空间,并通过计算其欧几里得模长,实现对多维指标的统一量化评价;最后,结合水资源综合模拟与调配模型(WAS模型)开展龙盘水库建设前后的长江流域抗旱减灾情势变化分析。【结果】研究表明,在极端干旱情景下,水库工程建设对区域抗旱减灾能力具有显著的综合提升作用,龙盘水库建成后干流梯级库群库径比提升 47.5%,水库蓄满率略有下降,但仍能保持在 95%以上;干流受水区域枯期可供水量增长 11.7%。总缺水率降幅为61.5%;相应的减损效益为89.8亿元。综合抗旱减灾效应指数由 0.49 提升至 0.75,增幅达 54.5%。【结论】该方法体系可实现干旱场景下水库综合抗旱减灾效应科学评价,具备较强的普适性与实用性,可为区域抗旱规划和水资源优化配置提供科学决策依据。
Abstract:[Objective] Large-scale reservoirs are recognized as critical infrastructure for regional water resources regulation, playing an increasingly strategic role in drought mitigation. The evaluation of their comprehensive drought mitigation effects involves multiple factors and dimensions, posing significant challenges in achieving accurate and scientific quantification.[Methods]A three-dimensional indicator system was established, comprising nine indicators across three dimensions: drought resistance capacity, drought mitigation effect, and disaster reduction benefit. A comprehensive evaluation approach was then developed by coupling the entropy weight method with a three-dimensional Euclidean norm model (EWM-3D-ENM). In this approach, indicator vectors were projected into a three-dimensional effect space, and their Euclidean norm lengths were calculated to enable unified quantitative assessment. Based on this framework, the Water Allocation Simulation (WAS) model was applied to simulate changes in drought mitigation performance in the Yangtze River Basin before and after the construction of the Longpan Reservoir.[Results]Under extreme drought scenarios, significant improvements in regional drought mitigation capacity were observed following the implementation of the reservoir project. The storage-to-runoff ratio of cascade reservoirs along the mainstream increased by 47.5%, and although the reservoir filling rate slightly declined, it remained above 95%. The available water supply during the dry season increased by 11.7% in key downstream areas. The total water shortage rate was reduced by 61.5%, with associated economic loss reduction benefits reaching 8.98 billion CNY. The comprehensive drought mitigation effect index rose from 0.49 to 0.75, representing a 54.5% increase.[Conclusion] The proposed evaluation method enables objective and integrated assessment of reservoir drought mitigation effects under drought scenarios. It exhibits strong generalizability and practical applicability, providing a scientific basis for regional drought management and optimized water resource allocation.
[1] 安妮, 张会兰, 许杨, 等. 金沙江流域气象干旱与农业干旱的时空演变特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2025, 32(4): 176-188.
[2] WANG T, TU X J, SINGH V P, et al. Socioeconomic drought analysis by standardized water supply and demand index under changing environment[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 347: 131248.
[3] TRENBERTH K E, DAI A G, VAN DER SCHRIER G, et al. Global warming and changes in drought[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4(1): 17-22.
[4] 刘君龙, 袁喆, 许继军, 等. 长江流域气象干旱演变特征及未来变化趋势预估[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(10): 28-36.
[5] YANG Y, MARAUN D, OSSó A, et al. Increased spatial extent and likelihood of compound long-duration dry and hot events in China, 1961—2014[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2023, 23(2): 693-709.
[6] 薛亮, 袁淑杰, 王劲松. 我国不同区域气象干旱成因研究进展与展望[J]. 干旱气象, 2023, 41(1): 1-13.
[7] 刘银峰, 徐海明, 雷正翠. 2006年川渝地区夏季干旱的成因分析[J]. 大气科学学报, 2009, 32(5): 686-694.
[8] 刘建刚. 2011年长江中下游干旱与历史干旱对比分析[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2017, 27(4): 46-50.
[10] 许继军, 陈桂亚, 杨明智, 等. 长江流域干旱灾害应对的主要难点及其科技需求[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(8): 25-31.
[11] 惠军, 陈银川, 林剑波, 等. 长江口地区水环境风险分析[J]. 人民长江, 2016, 47(13): 24-27.
[12] 华文剑, 冯慧婷, 崔亚朱, 等. 2022年夏季长江流域极端高温的研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2025, 40(5): 456-472.
[13] 张运林, 秦伯强, 朱广伟, 等. 论湖泊重要性及我国湖泊面临的主要生态环境问题[J]. 科学通报, 2022, 67(30): 3503-3519.
[14] 王千千, 高鸣远, 殷溢, 等. 典型枯水年江苏大中型水库水质空间变化及影响因素[J]. 环境科学学报, 2025, 45(6): 168-177.
[15]王智元, 刘欢, 胡鹏, 等. 西线工程不同水源区来水丰枯遭遇特征及其对调水的影响分析[J]. 水资源保护: 1-11.
[16] 桑丽源, 郭威, 张静文, 等. 城市地球关键带水文过程与水环境和水资源研究: 现状、挑战与未来[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(3): 445-461.
[17] GUO Y, HUANG Q, HUANG S Z, et al. Elucidating the effects of mega reservoir on watershed drought tolerance based on a drought propagation analytical method[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 598: 125738.
[18] 黄威, 张行南, 李若男, 等. 三峡水库对长江中下游干流抗旱补水作用研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版): 1-11.
[19] LU Y J, YAN D H, QIN T L, et al. Assessment of drought evolution characteristics and drought coping ability of water conservancy projects in Huang-Huai-Hai River Basin, China[J]. Water, 2016, 8(9): 378.
[20] POURMOGHIM P, BEHBOUDIAN M, KERACHIAN R. An uncertainty-based framework for evaluating and improving the long-term resilience of lakes under anthropogenic droughts[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 301: 113900.
[21] WANG Y M, YANG J, CHANG J X, et al. Assessing the drought mitigation ability of the reservoir in the downstream of the Yellow River[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 646: 1327-1335.
[22] SHAH D, ZHAO G, LI Y, et al. Assessing global reservoir-based hydrological droughts by fusing storage and evaporation[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2024, 51(1): e2023GL106159.
[23] JI D Y, LI X M, NIU Y Z, et al. Response strategies to socio-economic drought: An evaluation of drought resistance capacity from a reservoir operation perspective[J]. Water, 2025, 17(7): 1002.
[24] 洪佳玮, 吴向东, 温天福, 等. 基于AHP-EWM-模糊综合评价的江西省重点工业行业用水定额提标效益研究[J]. 给水排水, 2024, 60(12): 131-138.
[25] 陈建刚, 龚应安, 郑凡东, 等. 基于AHP和熵权法的北京水务韧性评价体系构建[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 60(5): 782-788.
[26] 马亚丽, 黄博, 孙栋元, 等. 基于组合权重-TOPSIS的河西走廊水资源安全及障碍因子诊断[J]. 水电能源科学, 2025, 43(6): 47-52.
[27] 胡宝华, 刘凯鑫, 晁伟鹏, 等. 新疆南疆水资源承载力评价预测及时空关联格局研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2025, 47(5): 87-92.
[28] 何祥, 胡燕祝, 王松. 一种基于改进LMAW-AHP的城市洪涝韧性评估方法[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2025, 48(4): 1-6.
[29] 苑希民, 苏智, 王丽娜, 等. 基于AHP-CRITIC-灰色关联分析的城市洪水风险评估研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2025, 36(1): 11-17.
[30] 姜德娟, 余灏哲, 李丽娟. 基于综合赋权和TOPSIS模型的山东省水资源承载力动态评价[J]. 资源科学, 2024, 46(3): 538-548.
[31] 王海科, 徐盼盼, 钱会. 关中地区干旱等级模糊综合评价[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2016, 27(3): 43-47.
[32] 姜浩, 张寒博, 刘诚斌, 等. 基于温度-降水-植被综合干旱指数的长江流域干旱时空动态监测[J]. 农业机械学报, 2025, 56(8): 95-106.
[33] 张睿康, 徐长江, 陈玺, 等. 长江流域典型枯水年径流时空演变特征分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2025, 41(4): 151-158.
[34] 胡学萃. 安申义:应尽快推动龙盘建设[N]. 中国能源报, 2014-05-19(22).
[35] 安申义. 同心协力 促进长江龙头水库尽快上马[J]. 红水河, 2014, 33(4): 1-2.
[36] 桑学锋, 刘志武, 王浩, 等. 长江水资源调配推演器构建与推演分析[J]. 中国水利, 2024(1): 6-11.
[37] 王敬磊, 戴丽纳. 淮河流域重要分区及跨省江河流域库径比探析[J]. 治淮, 2024(12): 39-40.
[38] 耿旭, 毛继新, 晋碧瑄. 基于蓄满率的三峡水库蓄水时期研究[J]. 泥沙研究, 2016, 41(1): 31-36.
[39] 张子贤. 关于可供水量定义及计算方法的讨论[J]. 人民长江, 2002, 33(7): 27-29.
[40] 杨芬, 刘军梅. 现状来水条件下密云水库可供水量的一种计算方法研究[J]. 水利发展研究, 2024, 24(11): 51-57.
[41] 刘江侠, 韩云鹏, 任涵璐. “京津雄” 城市供水安全保障水平评价研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2025, 43(6): 53-56.
[42] 关浩杰, 王小康. 黄淮海平原耕地利用生态效率与粮食生产安全耦合协调研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2025: 1-19.
GUAN H J, WANG X K. Coupling coordination between ecological efficiency of arable land and food production security in Huang–Huai–Hai Plain [J]. China Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning: 1–19.
[43] 刘秋常, 韩涵, 李慧敏, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的海绵城市建设绩效评价: 以河南省鹤壁市为例[J]. 人民长江, 2017, 48(14): 23-26.
[44] 冯威, 张小龙, 唐立鹤, 等. 基于AHP-EWM与多源数据的尾矿库安全风险动态监测评价[J]. 金属矿山, 2025(7): 172-181.
[45] 宗长富, 文龙, 何磊. 基于欧几里得聚类算法的三维激光雷达障碍物检测技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(1): 107-113.
[46] 田鹏莹, 孙慧娟, 薛婧雯, 等. 华北平原人工林地土壤质量评价及障碍因子分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2025, 45(4): 124-133.
[47] GAO J, WANG Z F, WANG Z W, et al. Macro-site selection and obstacle factor extraction of biomass cogeneration based on comprehensive weight method of Game theory[J]. Energy Reports, 2022, 8: 14416-14427.
[48] 桑学锋, 王浩, 王建华, 等. 水资源综合模拟与调配模型WAS(Ⅰ): 模型原理与构建[J]. 水利学报, 2018, 49(12): 1451-1459.
[49] 桑学锋, 赵勇, 翟正丽, 等. 水资源综合模拟与调配模型WAS(Ⅱ): 应用[J]. 水利学报, 2019, 50(2): 201-208.
基本信息:
中图分类号:TV697
引用信息:
[1]王雨欣,郑阳,桑学锋,等.基于 EWM-3D-ENM 的水库抗旱减灾综合效应评价方法[J].水利水电技术(中英文)().
基金信息:
中国长江电力股份有限公司项目(Z242302036); 国家自然科学基金联合基金项目(U2243233); 水利部重大科技项目(SKS-2022118)
2025-09-26
2025-09-26
2025-09-26