nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2019, S1, v.50 73-79
曲线顶管施工扰动土体变形理论分析及数值模拟研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家电网公司基建新技术研究项目(20160124)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2019.S1.013
摘要:

现有的顶管施工扰动理论及相关研究都是基于直线顶进工况,在曲线顶进工况下则存在一定的适用性问题。在对现有直线顶进扰动机理及沉降预测方法分析的基础上,研究曲线顶进的施工扰动机理及扰动范围大小,并提出了相应的地表沉降范围的估算方法和估算公式,同时以二维有限元为工具,对比研究曲线顶进和直线顶进施工的扰动变形规律,验证理论分析结果,为曲线顶管施工引起的周边地层变形扰动范围的估算提供依据,最后,从实际工程出发,经定量计算对比,得出了曲线外侧扰动范围小于直线顶进单侧扰动范围、直线顶进单侧扰动范围小于曲线顶进内侧扰动范围的研究结论。

Abstract:

The existing pipe jacking construction disturbance theory and related research are based on the linear jacking condition, and the application of the curve jacking condition has applicability problem. Based on the analysis of the existing prediction methods of linear pipe jacking disturbance mechanism and settlement on the curve of the jacking construction disturbance mechanism and the size of the load disturbance, and the estimation method and the estimation formula of the corresponding surface subsidence range is proposed, at the same time by two-dimensional finite element method, comparative study on the curve of the top range of construction into the construction disturbance and the size of the top line, verify the results of theoretical analysis, provide the basis for estimating the size of the surrounding strata, caused by the deformation of the pipe jacking curve finally, starting from the actual project, the quantitative calculation and comparison curve of lateral disturbance range is less than the linear jacking disturbance range was obtained, and the linear perturbation conclusions range is less than the curve of the inside part of the perturbation range.

参考文献

[1] ZHANG P,MA B,ZENG C,et al.Key techniques for the largest curved pipe jacking roof to date:A case study of Gongbei tunnel[J].Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology,2016,59:134- 145.

[2] 史培新,俞蔡城,潘建立,等.拱北隧道大直径曲线管幕顶管顶力研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2017,36(9):2251- 2259.

[3] 陈孝湘,张培勇,丁士君,等.大口径三维曲线顶管顶力估算及实测分析[J].岩土力学,2015,36(S1):547- 552.

[4] PECK R B.Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground[C]//ICSMFE.Proceeding of 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.Mexico City:A.A.Balkema,1969:225- 290.

[5] 房营光,莫海鸿,张传英.顶管施工扰动区土体变形的理论与实测分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(4):601- 605.

[6] 魏纲,徐日庆,屠玮.顶管施工引起的土体扰动理论分析及试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(3):476- 482.

[7] 魏纲,吴华君,陈春来.顶管施工中土体损失引起的沉降预测[J].岩土力学,2007,28(2):359- 363.

[8] 丁文其,袁森林,高小庆.电力隧道超大直径顶管施工扰动特性研究[J].岩土力学,2010,31(9):2901- 2906.

[9] 郑跃,丁文其,陈立生.受顶管施工影响的土体扰动分析与实测研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2010,6(5):1015- 1020.

[10] 王承德.曲线顶管初探[J].特种结构,1998,15(4):18- 21.

[11] 葛金科,张悦.急曲线顶管技术应用[J].岩土工程学报,2002,24(2):247- 250.

[12] 马保松,张雅春.曲线顶管技术及顶进力分析计算[J].岩土工程技术,2006,20(5):229- 232,259.

[13] 张鹏,曾聪,王道伟,等.拱北隧道曲线钢顶管接头橡胶圈结构数值模拟研究[J].隧道建设,2016,36(10):1226- 1231.

[14] 张斌梁,王翔宇,高海东,等.曲线顶管顶进管节应力特征试验研究[J].铁道标准设计,2016,60(5):95- 98.

[15] 魏龙海,程勇,陈炜韬,等.近接小半径曲线顶管施工扰动数值研究[J].四川建筑科学研究,2012,38(2):315- 318.

[16] 由广明,朱合华,刘学增,等.曲线顶管施工环境影响的三维有限元分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2007,3(2):218- 223.

[17] 丁文其,朱合华,范明星,等.管节-接头的弹性地基梁法及顶管施工模拟[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2001,29(5):616- 620.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2019.S1.013

中图分类号:TU990.3;TU433

引用信息:

[1]陈孝湘,刘华清,贺雷,等.曲线顶管施工扰动土体变形理论分析及数值模拟研究[J].水利水电技术,2019,50(S1):73-79.DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2019.S1.013.

基金信息:

国家电网公司基建新技术研究项目(20160124)

发布时间:

2019-06-20

出版时间:

2019-06-20

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索