nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, S1, v.56 405-411
高压富水地层水工隧洞新型堵汇排渗控设计与应用研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目(52179121); 流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室自主研究课题(SKL2022ZD05); 中国水利水电科学研究院基本科研业务费专项项目(GE0145B012021)
邮箱(Email): caorl@iwhr.com;
DOI: 10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2025.S1.062
摘要:

富水隧洞堵排结合处理措施后仍存在难以同时满足外水压力和渗流量标准的双控要求,探索渗控新方法具有重要意义。灌浆堵水对减少隧洞渗流量具有明显作用但难以完全隔绝渗漏,实施后隧洞呈现小流量高水压的典型特点,排水和汇水起到明显卸压效果却无法抑制渗流量,为此在传统堵排设计基础上提出了堵汇排渗控理念,并剖析了不同渗控措施下衬砌周边水环境演化规律。研究结果表明,排水措施较浅时泄压能力差而较深时削弱了灌浆堵水效率,致使富水高压地层应用中泄压效果受限,通过设置汇水层能有效疏通衬砌周围的渗流通道,能在不影响灌浆封堵且大幅提升排水泄压效果;在局部排水孔堵塞或非全断面排水时,堵汇排设计能够提供衬砌背后局部渗流和水压消散通道,避免了衬砌偏压效应。新型堵汇排措施可为富水地层高外水压力渗控设计提供新思路。

Abstract:

Deeply buried tunnels, even after adopting combined plugging and drainage treatment measures, still face difficulties in simultaneously meeting the dual control requirements of external water pressure and seepage flow standards. Exploring new seepage control method is of significant importance. To this end, the concept of “plugging, collecting, and draining” for seepage control is proposed, and the evolution laws of the surrounding water environment of the lining under different seepage control measures are analyzed. The research shows that grouting for water plugging plays a significant role in reducing the tunnel's seepage flow but is challenging to completely prevent leakage. After implementation, the tunnel exhibits the typical characteristics of “low flow, high water pressure”. Drainage and water collection have a noticeable pressure relief effect but cannot control the seepage flow, making the combined application of plugging, collecting, and draining the key to reducing flow and relieving pressure. When drainage measures are shallow, the pressure relief capability is poor, and when they are deep, the effectiveness of grouting for water plugging is weakened, limiting the pressure relief effect in water-rich and high-pressure strata. By setting up a collection layer, the seepage channels around the lining can be effectively dredged, which does not affect the grouting sealing and significantly improves the drainage and pressure relief effect. In cases of partial blockage of drainage holes or non-full-section drainage, the design of plugging, collecting, and draining can provide channels for local seepage and water pressure dissipation behind the lining, thus avoiding the lining bias effect. The new plugging, collecting, and draining measures can offer a new approach for the design of seepage control under high external water pressure in water-rich strata.

参考文献

[1] 赵力,苏岩,王博,等.堵排水方式对秦岭隧洞衬砌外水压力的影响研究[J].人民长江,2022,53(7):148-153.

[2] SHIN H S,YOUN D J,CHAE S E,et al.Effective control of pore water pressures on tunnel linings using pin-hole drain method[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2009,24(5):555-561.

[3] LI Genxiao,WANG Chang,WANG Gang,et al.Effect of the blocking water and limiting discharge and surrounding rock permeability on the stability of subsea tunnel[J].Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,2021,39(2):1365.

[4] 丁蔚,陈子扬,刁浩宇,等.宝石岭隧道水环境效应与注浆治理研究[J].水利水电技术,2023,54(S2):215-219.

[5] 中华人民共和国水利部.水工隧洞设计规范:SL279—2016 [S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2016.

[6] 刘立鹏,汪小刚,段庆伟,等.隧洞衬砌外水压力的取值方法与应对措施研究[J].水利水电技术,2017,48(8):63-67.

[7] 李伟,杨丹,李庆.高水压山岭隧道衬砌结构水压力特征研究[J].铁道工程学报,2013(11):57-61.

[8] 张治国,汪嘉程,赵其华,等.富水山岭地区邻近补水断层隧道结构上的水头分布解析求解[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(S2):3378-3394.

[9] 李林毅,阳军生,高超,等.考虑注浆圈作用的体外排水隧道渗流场解析研究[J].岩土工程学报,2020,42(1):133-141.

[10] 傅睿智,郭凯,黄鹤程,等.复合衬砌外水压力模型试验研究[J].人民长江,2019,50(6):192-197.

[11] 谢小帅,陈华松,肖欣宏,等.深埋引水隧洞不同排水方案渗流场及衬砌外水压力研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,45(S1):64-68.

[12] PREISIG G,DEMATTEIS A,TORRI R,et al.Modelling discharge rates and ground settlement induced by tunnel excavation[J].Rock Me chanics & Rock Engineering,2014,47(3):869-884.

[13] 赵大洲,梁春雨,党雪梅,等.引汉济渭工程黄三段深埋长输水隧洞排水方案研究[J].水利水电技术,2017,48(8):120-125.

[14] 刘立鹏,汪小刚,段庆伟,等.高压富水地层水工隧洞衬砌外水压力确定与应对措施[J].岩土工程学报,2022,44(8):1549-1557.

[15] WANNENMACHER H,ENTFELLNER M,HAUER H.Drilling and grouting works for pressurised groundwater conditions of the semmering base tunnel[J].Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,2022,40(9):4377-4391.

[16] 王新越,王如宾,王丹,等.滇中引水松林隧洞高外水压力作用数值模拟分析[J].隧道与地下工程灾害防治,2023,5(4):72-80.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2025.S1.062

中图分类号:TV554

引用信息:

[1]郭清华,皮进,李宇,等.高压富水地层水工隧洞新型堵汇排渗控设计与应用研究[J].水利水电技术(中英文),2025,56(S1):405-411.DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2025.S1.062.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金项目(52179121); 流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室自主研究课题(SKL2022ZD05); 中国水利水电科学研究院基本科研业务费专项项目(GE0145B012021)

发布时间:

2025-01-13

出版时间:

2025-01-13

网络发布时间:

2025-01-13

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索