| 204 | 0 | 195 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
西藏地区由于长日照、高辐射导致生态修复进程中水分蒸散量高于我国其他地区,蒸散成为直接决定生态修复成败的关键。拉林铁路沿雅鲁藏布江两岸布设,铁路的建设不可避免地破坏雅鲁藏布江流域沿线的植被和土壤,给雅鲁藏布江流域生态系统产生不利影响。本研究以拉林铁路沿线站点气温、气压等气象资料,利用Penman-Monteith (P-M)模型计算了月、季及年的潜在蒸散量(PE),分析了拉林铁路沿线站点PE变化特征。结果表明:拉林铁路沿线站点潜在蒸散量PE受温度、太阳辐射、饱和水汽压、风速等多种因素共同作用,温度和风速分别成为主导PE增加和降低的关键因子。干季的PE大小由温度和水汽压的共同作用决定,湿季则主要受参考作物表面净辐射直接影响。拉林铁路的建设不可避免地造成沿线站点PE以及平均PE显著升高,进而减缓铁路沿线的生态修复进程。平均温度是影响拉林铁路沿线站点PE的首要因素,参考作物表面净辐射和降雨量对PE也有极显著影响。
Abstract:Due to long sunshine and high radiation, water evapotranspiration in Xizang is higher than that in other regions of China in the process of ecological restoration, and evapotranspiration has become the key to the success of ecological restoration. The Lalin Railway is laid along both banks of the the Yarlung Zangbo River. The construction of the railway will inevitably damage the vegetation and soil along the the Yarlung Zangbo River basin, and will have adverse effects on the ecosystem of the the Yarlung Zangbo River basin. This study used meteorological data such as temperature and air pressure at stations along the Lalin Railway to calculate monthly, seasonal, and annual potential evapotranspiration(PE) using the Penman Monteith(P-M) model, and analyzed the characteristics of PE changes at stations along the Lalin Railway. The result show that the potential evapotranspiration of PE at stations along the Lalin Railway is influenced by multiple factors such as temperature, solar radiation, saturated water vapor pressure, and wind speed. Temperature and wind speed are the key factors that dominate the increase and decrease of PE, respectively. The size of PE in the dry season is determined by the combined effect of temperature and water vapor pressure, while in the wet season it is mainly directly affected by the net radiation from the reference crop surface. The construction of the Lalin Railway inevitably leads to a significant increase in station PE and average PE along the railway, thereby slowing down the ecological restoration process along the railway. The average temperature is the primary factor affecting the PE of stations along the Lalin Railway, and the net radiation and rainfall on the surface of reference crops also have a significant impact on PE.
[1] 王志强,柳长顺,刘小勇,等.关于建立西藏水生态补偿机制的设想[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(1):16-20.
[2] 宋柯馨,蒋馥根,胡宗达,等.西藏自治区草地地上生物量遥感反演研究[J].生态学报,2023,43(13):5600-5613.
[3] 魏楷丽,梁晓平,于晶晶,等.青藏高原草枯期植物群落与海拔对西藏马鹿食物组成的影响[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(4):1117-1122.
[4] 万运帆,李玉娥,高清竹,等.西藏气候变化趋势及其对青稞产量的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2018,35(4):374-380.
[5] 胡一帆,王浩,焦磊,等.青藏高原重大建设工程生态修复综合效益评估指标体系[J].生态学报,2022,42(18):7565-7576.
[6] 李海东.雅鲁藏布江流域风沙化土地遥感监测与植被恢复研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2012.
[7] 国家林业局.中国荒漠化和沙化状况公报[R].北京:国家林业局,2015.
[8] 张卫红,刘大林,苗彦军,等.西藏3种野生牧草苗期对干旱胁迫的响应[J].生态学报,2017,37(21):7277-7285.
[9] 张宪洲,王小丹,高清竹,等.开展高寒退化生态系统恢复与重建技术研究,助力西藏生态安全屏障保护与建设[J].生态学报,2016,36(22):7083-7087.
[10] 陈斌,李海东,曹学章.西藏高原典型生态系统退化及植被恢复技术综述[J].世界林业研究,2014,27(5):18-23.
[11] 许文年,王铁桥,叶建军.岩石边坡护坡绿化技术应用研究[J].水利水电技术,2002(7):35-36+40.
[12] 赵燕洲,薛春晓,杨印海.青藏铁路路域高寒草原生态修复技术研究[J].铁道工程学报,2013,30(7):90-94.
[13] 栗忠飞,高吉喜,刘海江.内蒙古多伦县4种植被对沙地土壤的修复效应[J].生态与农村环境学报,2017,33(1):15-22.
[14] 陈琳,李晨光,李锋民,等.水生态修复植物生长特性比较与应用潜力[J].环境污染与防治,2022,44(7):933-938.
[15] 郭忠升,李耀林.植物生长与土壤水关系调控起始期[J].生态学报,2009,29(10):5721-5729.
[16] 何茜,李吉跃,齐涛.植物生长调节剂对国槐蒸腾耗水的影响(英文)[J].北京林业大学学报,2006(S2):25-30.
[17] 阎尚博,钱永强,张艳,等.土壤含水量对4种委陵菜属植物生长及生理影响[J].草业科学,2020,37(1):98-105.
[18] 邹远华,强新刚,张广泽.拉林铁路罗布穷则泥石流活动特征与灾害防治[J].铁道工程学报,2021,38(2):30-34+40.
[19] 黄艺丹,潘前,姚令侃,等.川藏铁路拉林段地应力特征及高地应力风险调控选线策略[J].工程地质学报,2021,29(2):375-382.
[20] 王翔,牌立芳,吴红刚.拉林铁路变坡面倾角崩塌落石对桥梁结构破坏作用的模拟分析与试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(8):1622-1633.
[21] 葛开国,王玉民,余朝阳,等.铁路建设项目施工期环境保护考评体系建立——以新建川藏铁路拉萨至林芝段为例[J].环境保护,2017,45(17):60-64.
[22] 夏军,谈戈.全球变化与水文科学新的进展与挑战[J].资源科学,2002(3):1-7.
[23] RICHARD G A,LUIS S P,DIRK R,et al.Crop evapotranspiration:Guidelines for computing crop water requirements [EB/OL].[2009-07-12](2024-05-01) .http://www.fao.org/do2 crep /x0490e /x0490e001 html.
[24] 杨志刚,唐小萍,路红亚,等.近50年雅鲁藏布江流域潜在蒸散量的变化特征[J].地理学报,2013,68(9):1263-1268.
[25] 徐键.拉林铁路牵引供电工程建设与创新[J].中国铁路,2022(3):63-69.
[26] 段娅楠,季漩,郭若愚,等.雅鲁藏布江流域潜在蒸散发的气候敏感性及其变化的主导因子分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(2):261-268.
[27] 刘文辉,张宝忠,魏征,等.不同气候区潜在蒸散量变化趋势及归因分析[J].中国农业气象,2023,44 (7):545-559.
[28] 史继清,豆永丽,杨霏云,等.西藏地区潜在蒸散量时空格局特征及影响因素研究[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(3):724-732.
[29] 曹永强,齐静威,王菲,等.辽宁省潜在蒸散量演变规律及归因分析[J].生态学报,2020,40(10):3519-3525.
[30] ZHANG X Q,REN Y,YIN Z Y,et al.Spatial and temporal variation patterns of reference evapotranspiration across the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau during 1971-2004[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres,2009,114(D15).
[31] 王晓东,马晓群,许莹,等.淮河流域参考作物蒸散量变化特征及主要气候因子的贡献分析[J].中国农业气象,2013,34(6):661-667.
[32] 韩静艳,赵勇,王建华,等.京津冀地区不同土地利用类型对潜在蒸散发的影响(英文)[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2019,29(6):922-934.
[33] CHEN S B,LIU Y F,AXEL T.Climatic change on the Tibetan Plateau:Potential Evapotranspiration Trends from 1961–2000[J].Climatic Change,2006,76(3):291-319.
[34] MU Q,HEINSCH F A,ZHAO M,et al.Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2007,111(4):519-536.
[35] XIE H,YE J,LIU X,et al.Warming and drying trends on the Tibetan Plateau (1971—2005)[J].Theoretical and Applied Climatology,2010(101):241-253.
[36] 赵志平,刘纪远,邵全琴.三江源自然保护区土地覆被变化特征分析[J].地理科学,2010,30(3):415-420.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2024.S2.049
中图分类号:U21;P426.2
引用信息:
[1]石立,张乃畅,耿启明,等.拉林铁路及沿线气候因子对潜在蒸散量的影响[J].水利水电技术(中英文),2024,55(S2):304-310.DOI:10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2024.S2.049.
2024-11-15
2024-11-15
2024-11-15