土工格栅加筋细粒含量土循环剪切特性分析Analysis on cyclic shear characteristics of geogrid-reinforced soil with fine grain content
李丽华,屠娴哲,刘帅帅,黄少平,周鑫隆
摘要(Abstract):
为探究加筋角度与结构剪切特性之间的关系,采用大型循环剪切仪开展多角度土工格栅加筋土循环剪切试验,探究加筋角度和循环荷载对加筋细粒含量土剪切特性的影响,分析循环剪切过程中及加筋循环后直剪加筋细粒含量土的剪切性能变化。结果表明:不同角度土工格栅加筋细粒含量土剪切应力具有差异性,单向直剪试验中,30°加筋角度下,加筋细粒含量土剪切强度最大;法向应力为300 kPa时,6种角度(30°、60°、90°、120°、150°、180°)加筋界面均呈现循环剪切硬化的特征,180°加筋角度下,循环剪切应力峰值最大;剪切应力和剪切刚度随循环次数呈正相关关系,界面阻尼比随循环周期发展变化趋于平缓;不同循环幅值和法向应力下,30°加筋角度下细粒含量土呈现弱剪切硬化现象,随循环幅值或法向应力增加,土工格栅开始受力拉动上下土体,剪切应力增幅提高。
关键词(KeyWords): 加筋角度;循环剪切特性;抗剪强度;直剪试验;加筋细粒含量土
基金项目(Foundation): 武汉市应用基础前沿项目(2020020601012278);; 国家自然科学基金项目(52108315);; 湖北工业大学杰出人才基金项目(XJ2021000501)
作者(Author): 李丽华,屠娴哲,刘帅帅,黄少平,周鑫隆
DOI: 10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2022.09.019
参考文献(References):
- [1] CHOWDHURY S S.A study on lateral earth pressure against strutted retaining wall in cohesionless soil deposit[J].International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2019,13(2):122-138.
- [2] KOERNER R M,KOERNER G R.An extended data base and recommendations regarding 320 failed geosynthetic reinforced mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls[J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2018,46(6):904-912.
- [3] SUKMAK G.Predicting pullout resistance of bearing reinforcement embedded in cohesive frictional soils[J].Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,2020,32(3):1-8.
- [4] EID H T.Shear strength of geosynthetic composite systems for design of landfill liner and cover slopes[J].Geotextiles & Geomembranes,2011,29(3):335-344.
- [5] 刘飞禹,沈春春,王军,等.不同土工合成材料加筋土界面的静动力直剪特性[J].上海大学学报(自然科学版),2016,22(5):637-647.LIU Feiyu,SHEN Chunchun,WANG Jun,et al.Direct shear behavior of reinforcement soil interface in different geosynthetics[J].Journal of Shanghai University(Natural Science Edition),2016,22(5):637-647.
- [6] 王军,林旭,符洪涛.砂土-格栅筋土界面特性的本构模型研究[J].岩土力学,2014,35(S2):75-84.WANG Jun,LIN Xu,FU Hongtao.Study of constitutive model of sand-geogrid interface behavior in geogrid/geotextile reinforced soil[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2014,35(S2):75-84.
- [7] 王军,胡惠丽,刘飞禹,等.粒孔比对筋土界面直剪特性的影响[J].岩土力学,2018,39(S2):115-122.WANG Jun,HU Huili,LIU Feiyu,et al.Effects of direct shear characteristics of sand-geogrid interface under different aperture ratios[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2018,39(S2):115-122.
- [8] 王军,林旭,刘飞禹,等.砂土与格栅界面相互作用的直剪试验研究[J].岩土力学,2014,35(S1):113-120.WANG Jun,LIN Xu,LIU Feiyu,et al.Research on interaction of geogrid and sand interface by direct shear tests[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2014,35(S1):113-120.
- [9] 熊甜甜,廖红建,杨博,等.加筋土筋土界面抗剪强度影响因素试验研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2018,14(3):629-634.XIONG Tiantian,LIAO Hongjian,YANG Bo,et al.Experimental Study on influence factors of shear strength between geogrid and soil interface[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2018,14(3):629-634.
- [10] 王军,施静,刘飞禹,等.砂土颗粒级配对格栅-土界面静、动力直剪特性的影响[J].岩土力学,2019,40(1):109-117.WANG Jun,SHI Jing,LIU Feiyu,et al.Effect of particle gradation on static and dynamic direct shear properties of geogrid-sand interface[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2019,40(1):109-117.
- [11] 李丽华,文贝,胡智,等.建筑垃圾填料与土工合成材料加筋剪切性能研究[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2019,52(4):11-316.LI Lihua,WEN Bei,HU Zhi,et al.Study on reinforced shear behavior of construction waste filler and geosynthetics[J].Engineering Journal of Wuhan University,2019,52(4):311-316.
- [12] 刘飞禹,林旭,王军,等.循环剪切作用对格栅与砂土界面剪切特性的影响[J].中国公路学报,2015,28(2):1-7.LIU Feiyu,LIN Xu,WANG Jun,et al.Effects of cyclic shear load on behavior of sand geogrid interface[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,2015,28(2):1-7.
- [13] 李丽华,臧天宝,刘永莉,等.纤维底渣混合土循环剪切性能研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2021,40(1):196-205.LI Lihua,ZANG Tianbao,LIU Yongli,et al.Cyclic shear performance of fiber bottom ash mixed soils[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2021,40(1):196-205.
- [14] 杨军,刘飞禹,朱凯.纤维加筋水泥土的静动力剪切特性研究[J]..地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(S2):563-569.YANG Jun,LIU Feiyu,ZHU Kai.Research on static and dynamic shear strength properties of fiber reinforced cement soil[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2021,17(S2):563-569.
- [15] 王军,王攀,刘飞禹,等.密实度不同时格栅-砂土界面循环剪切及其后直剪特性[J].岩土工程学报,2016,38(2):342-349.WANG Jun,WANG Pan,LIU Feiyu,et al.Cyclic and post-cyclic direct shear behaviors of geogrid-sand interface with different soil densities[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2016,38(2):342-349.
- [16] 刘飞禹,胡惠丽,王军,等.粒孔比对筋-土界面循环剪切特性的影响[J].中国公路学报,2019,32(12):115-122.LIU Feiyu,HU Huili,WANG Jun,et al.Influence of aperture ratio on cyclic shear behavior of geogrid-soil interface[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,2019,32(12):115-122.
- [17] 刘飞禹,郑其婷,王军,等.颗粒形状对粗粒土-格栅界面剪切特性的影响[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2021,43(6):48-56.LIU Feiyu,ZHENG Qiting,WANG Jun,et al.Effects of particle shape on shear behaviors of interface between coarse-grained soil and geogrid[J].Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering,2021,43(6):48-56.
- [18] 徐林荣.筋土界面参数测试方法合理选择研究[J].岩土力学,2003,24(3):458-462.XU Linrong.Research on selection of measuring method of interface Parameters between reinforcements and soils[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2003,24(3):458-462.
- [19] JEWELL R A,WROTH C P.Direct shear tests on reinforced sand[J].Geotechnique,1987,37(1):53-68.
- [20] 何玉琪,廖红建,董琪,等.加筋材料改良黄土强度特性的试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2021,43(S1):181-185.HE Yuqi,LIAO Hongjian,DONG Qi,et al.Experimental study on strength characteristics of geogrid-reinforced loess[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2021,43(S1):181-185.
- [21] 李岑,张孟喜,王东.不同角度土工格栅加筋剪切特性的试验研究[J].水力发电,2021,47(7):106-110.LI Cen,ZHANG Mengxi,WANG Dong.Study on shear strength characteristics of geogrid reinforcement with different angles based on direct shear test[J].Water Power,2021,47(7):106-110.
- [22] SIEIRA A C C F.Experimental study on soil-geogrid interaction mechanisms[D].Brazil:Pontifical University of Rio de Janeiro,2003.
- [23] 中华人民共和国建设部.土工试验方法标准:GB/T 50123—1999[S].北京:中国计划出版社,1999.Ministry of construction of the People′s Republic of China.Standard for geotechnical test methods:GB/T 50123—1999 [S].Beijing:China Planning Press,1999.
- [24] 沈扬.土力学原理十记(第二版)[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2021.SHEN Yang.Ten Notes on Principles of Soil Mechanics (Second Edition)[M].Beijing:China Building Industry Press,2021.
- [25] ASADZADEH M,SOROUSH A.Macro-and micromechanical evaluation of cyclic simple shear test by discrete element method[J].Particuology,2016:43(3):942-953.
- [26] 徐超,陈洪帅,石志龙,等.筋-土界面力学特性的水平循环剪切试验研究[J].岩土力学,2013,34(6):1553-1559.XU Chao,CHEN Hongshuai,SHI Zhilong,et al.Research on the mechanical behavior of soil-reinforcement interface by horizontal cyclic shear test[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2013,34(6):1553-1559.
- [27] DESAI C S,DRUMM E C,ZAMAN M M.Cyclic testing and modeling of interfaces[J].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,ASCE,1985,111(6):793-815.
- [28] NYE C J,FOX P J.Dynamic shear behavior of a needle-punched geosynthetic clay liner[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2007,133(8):973-983.
- [29] VIEIRA C S,LOPES M D L,CALDEIRA L.Sand-geotextile interface characterisation through monotonic and cyclic direct shear tests[J].Geosynthetics International,2013,20(1):26-37.
- [30] 刘飞禹,王攀,王军,等.筋—土界面循环剪切刚度和阻尼比的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2016,37(S1):159-165.LIU Feiyu,WANG Pan,WANG Jun,et al.Experimental research on reinforcement-soil interface stiffness and damping ratio under cyclic shearing[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2016,37(S1):159-165.
- [31] 芮圣洁,国振,王立忠,等.钙质砂与钢界面循环剪切刚度与阻尼比的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2020,41(1):78-86.RUI Shengjie,GUO Zhen,WANG Lizhong,et al.Experimental study of cyclic shear stiffness and damping ratio of carbonate sand-steel interface[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2020,41(1):78-86.
- [32] 盛宏志,艾聘博,方亚男,等.纤维底渣混合土筋-土界面循环剪切刚度和阻尼比研究[J].中国水运(下半月),2021,21(12):112-114.SHENG Hongzhi,AI Pinbo,FANG Yanan,et al.Study on cyclic shear stiffness and damping ratio of reinforcement-soil interface of fiber-slag mixture [J].China Shipping (second half month),2021,21(12):112-114.
- [33] 赖丰文,李丽萍,陈福全.双向土工格栅与砂土界面循环剪切特性研究[J].中国科技论文,2017,12(13):342-349.LAI Fengwen,LI Liping,CHEN Fuquan.The cyclic shear behavior of interface between sand-biaxial geogrid[J].China Sciencepaper,2017,12(13):342-349.
- [34] 朱建群,孔令伟,钟方杰.粉粒含量对砂土强度特性的影响[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(11):1647-1652.ZHU Jianqun,KONG Lingwei,ZHONG Fangjie.Effect of fines content on strength of silty sands[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2007,29(11):1647-1652.